Revision of Main Page from Tue, 10/04/2011 - 05:14

The revisions let you track differences between multiple versions of a post.

SMS Advertising – A Simple Way to Reach The Market

Many text marketing experts are of the opinion that the future of local and regional advertisement is on the mobile web. In India mobile market is a growing at a faster pace and marketers are tapping the potential of this medium by adopting SMS advertising as a tool to market their products and services. Most of the companies have adopted this tool of marketing and now are enjoying great business profits. In business, working with innovative strategies is always an advantage and one such strategy is bulk SMS India wherein larger audience can be targeted with just a single SMS.

The popularity of sending messages in India is soaring high and shows no signs of slowing down, therefore marketers use Mobile SMS advertising to promote their products and services. In India, the cost of sending a SMS is even less than making a call and this is the reason why Bulk SMS India is a widely practiced marketing way. Without being an innovator in the business, it is not possible for the companies to get the desired profit by promoting goods and services. In our society communication is extremely important and with SMS advertising best communication or dialogue can be established between the company and the prospective customers. SMS advertising in India is at its peak and now marketers prefer this form of advertising over the traditional forms of advertising like TV, print or radio.

Bulk SMS India is a common phenomenon these days as it helps in reaching out to larger audience within no time. Since India has handsome amount of mobile phone users, therefore marketers prefer to catch hold of them through SMS advertising.

Comments

saggen's picture

Problem with RAM notation specification...

Hi,

I am not sure if I have come across a minor bug in the OpenMx RAM specification. For some reason I cannot free up an element of the S matrix when fitting a twin sub-model. I have tried several different syntax variations (i.e., using the label name and specifically freeing the S parameter element) to free up the parameter, but for some reason the specified covariance parameter element is not being estimated and included in the OpenMx output summary. The odd thing about this is that when checking the S matrix specification, the parameter is set to TRUE. Is this a known bug?

Thanks,

--steve

mhunter's picture

This is not the appropriate

This is not the appropriate spot for this question. Please make a forum post about it instead. I will be deleting this comment soon.

To address your question, that is definitely not the desired behavior. Could you provide a minimal code example that produces the bug? Or some part of the script that does this? It's difficult to track down where the problem is without some example to work with.

Another thing to check for is re-setting a parameter. If you set a parameter to free=TRUE in line 15 of your script and set it to free=FALSE in line 33, then it will silently be free=FALSE even though you set it to free=TRUE initially.

tbates's picture

make new page link?

good if this page had a link to create new pages...

seotools's picture

how to create a new page with

how to create a new page with link

AttachmentSize
rdr feed.txt 934 bytes
tbates's picture

did someone delete all the links out of this page?

seems not good that all the links are gone from the page?