mxNormalInterval() proposal

52 replies [Last post]
tbates's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/31/2009
.95 looks better than 95 The

.95 looks better than 95

The summary is nice. is there a reason that the lower bounds are in engineering notation?

confidence intervals:
                    lbound     ubound
common.A[1,1] 5.483291e-01 0.68392244
common.C[1,1] 4.222835e-18 0.05225537
common.E[1,1] 1.537470e-01 0.19561727

neale's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/31/2009
I expect because at least one

I expect because at least one of them is very close to zero.